Lucas Hughes Lucas Hughes's Profile Page

Lucas Hughes Lucas Hughes

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

信頼的なL4M1真実試験 &合格スムーズL4M1難易度受験料 |正確的なL4M1資格受験料Scope and Influence of Procurement and Supply

JPTestKingが提供した商品の品質が高く、頼られているサイトでございます。購入前にネットで部分なL4M1問題集を無料にダウンロードしてあとで弊社の商品を判断してください。JPTestKingは君のL4M1試験に１００％の合格率を保証いたします。迷ってないください。

CIPS L4M1 認定試験の出題範囲：

トピック
出題範囲

トピック 1

Public, private, charity, not-for-profit, manufacturing, retail, construction, financial, agriculture, and service sectors. It also covers analyzing the impact of the public sector on procurement and supply chain activities public sector objectives, regulations, competition, accountability, and value for money. It finally covers the impact of the private sector on procurement or supply chain activities.

トピック 2

Understand and analyse the key steps when procuring goods or services: This section measures that skills of purchasing managers and procurement officers in identifying and evaluating stages in the sourcing process, planning, supplier selection, and contract management.

トピック 3

Understand and analyse the added value through procurement and supply chain management: This section of the exam measures skills of supply chain managers related to identifying added value outcomes in procurement and supply and evaluating cost savings, service improvements, and innovationsu contributions.It also measures procurement and supply processes that contribute to added value.

>> L4M1真実試験 <<

最短ルートのL4M1 合格への扉を開こう

しかし、L4M1「Scope and Influence of Procurement and Supply」試験は簡単ではありません。専門的な知識が必要で、もしあなたはまだこの方面の知識を欠かれば、JPTestKingは君に向ける知識を提供いたします。JPTestKingの専門家チームは彼らの知識や経験を利用してあなたの知識を広めることを助けています。そしてあなたにL4M1試験に関するテスト問題と解答が分析して差し上げるうちにあなたのIT専門知識を固めています。

CIPS Scope and Influence of Procurement and Supply 認定 L4M1 試験問題 (Q35-Q40):

質問 # 35
In the supplier selection part of the Procurement Cycle, what criteria can a Procurement Manager use to ensure they award to the best supplier? (25 points)

正解：

解説：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
How to approach this question:
- This is quite an open question and there are many different things you could mention. One way to approach it would be to use Carter's 10 Cs- discuss a couple of these. OR just give a couple of criteria in different paragraphs. Some ideas include: Supplier financial status, Reputation / References, Quality, Availability, CSR Policies / Ethics / Environmental considerations, Accreditations, Added Value. This list is not exhaustive.
- If you're going for Carter's 10 Cs you could name a couple of these: competency, consistency, capability, control, cost, cash, clean, communication, culture, commitment
- I don't think either approach is better or worse. Choose the criteria you know the most about and write about those.
- The question doesn't tell you how many criteria to name, so you have to make a judgement call here. I would aim for 5-6. But if you can only remember 4 that's fine. The main thing they're looking for is that you explain for each one 1) what it is 2) how procurement can check 3) why procurement would look at that criteria 4) an example. If you do too many you risk not going into enough detail on each. It's a balance. 5 is always a good number to aim for if the question doesn't state.
Example Essay
In the procurement cycle, the supplier selection phase is a critical juncture that demands consideration.
Procurement Managers shoulder the responsibility of identifying and awarding contracts to suppliers who not only meet immediate needs, but contribute to the long-term success of the organization. This essay explores various criteria a Procurement Manager can employ to ensure the selection of the best supplier: financial stability, reputation, quality, availability, CSR policies, and added value.
Financial stability is a foundational criterion in supplier selection. Assessing a supplier's financial status involves a multifaceted evaluation, with liquidity and gearing ratio taking center stage. The acid test, comparing short-term assets to liabilities, offers insights into a supplier's ability to settle debts promptly, with a ratio exceeding 1 indicating financial health. Meanwhile, the gearing ratio, reflecting the proportion of capital funded by loans,aids in gauging financial risk, with a ratio below 50% considered low-risk. Relying on published Profit and Loss statements and income statements, along with financial credit checks from platforms like Dun and Bradstreet, empowers Procurement Managers to make informed decisions. This financial scrutiny is imperative to avoid entering contracts with suppliers facing imminent financial struggles, safeguarding against potential disruptions to the supply chain.
Reputation and references are another pivotal criterion. Seeking references from previous contracts allows Procurement Managers to gauge a supplier's track record in successfully delivering on similar commitments.
Independent reviews and informal market inquiries supplement this information, providing a holistic understanding of a supplier's performance. However, caution is advised in overreliance on past performance, as variables like personnel changes or contract scale differences may impact outcomes. Recognizing that past shortcomings may have been addressed internally further emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to reference evaluation.
Thirdly, Quality. Beyond the product itself, considerations extend to the supplier's technological capabilities, manufacturing processes, and relevant accreditations such as ISO 9001. Physical visits to supplier sites may be warranted, especially for products like raw materials where samples can be requested. Adhering to recognized safety standards and assessing factors like fire retardancy ensures that the quality of manufactured goods aligns with established benchmarks.
Next, Availability is another important criteria to consider. Procurement Managers must evaluate a supplier's capacity and capability to meet specific requirements. Inquiries about existing contracts and flexibility in response to demand fluctuations provide insights into a supplier's commitment and responsiveness. Assessing the supplier's workload and the significance of the buyer in their client portfolio helps determine the level of attention and service the buyer can expect. A buyer may wish to avoid working for a supplier who is already stretched very thinly with other contracts.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policies and ethical considerations have gained prominence in supplier selection. Beyond legal compliance, Procurement Managers may scrutinize a supplier's history for convictions or negative press related to corruption, bribery, or fraud. The presence of a Modern Slavery Policy and Environmental Policy, along with relevant accreditations like ISO14001 or Fair Trade certification, attests to a supplier's commitment to ethical and sustainable practices. Procurement would likely seek to appoint a supplier who's CSR vision aligns with their own company's.
Lastly, added value is an important criteria to consider. This is particularly so for Public Sector Organizations governed by the Social Value Act. In addition to meeting contractual requirements, suppliers may offer knowledge sharing, training, improved processes, or contribute to social value by employing local community members or providing apprenticeships. This criterion aligns procurement decisions with broader organizational goals, enhancing the overall impact of supplier relationships and benefitting the local community.
In conclusion, a careful combination of financial scrutiny, reputation assessment, quality evaluation, availability considerations, CSR policies, and added value analysis forms the bedrock of effective supplier selection in the procurement cycle. Procurement Managers, armed with a holistic understanding of these criteria, should seek not only to fulfil immediate needs, but also consider the long-term impact of supplier appointments.
Tutor Notes
- A 'good' scoring answer (50-70%) will explain the criteria well and give examples. If you're looking for a distinction level answer (70% +) you could also mention advantages, disadvantages and risks associated with each of the criteria. For example, when looking at references and reputation it's important to know that a supplier would only ever provide a good reference to you, they would never tell you of a contract that failed.
Another example is that financial data may be skewed- a supplier may have a low score if they are just starting up or have recently remortgaged a property. It's therefore important to get a commentary as well as the figures / scores.
- You could also mention that criteria could be weighted e.g. more importance given to quality than financial status and also consider how easy or difficult it would be to get the information e.g. a supplier may say they have lots of availability to deliver the service you require, but they may just be saying this to win business.
How do you know for sure?
- Social Value Act isn't in this syllabus. If you work in Public Sector procurement it's something you'll be very familiar with. If you don't or you're outside of the UK do not worry about this. I've just included it to show how you can bring in your own knowledge to questions like this. You could think of particular criteria that's important to your industry and write about that. The Social Value Act: What is it, and why is it important? (samtaler.co.uk)
- Study guide p.77

質問 # 36
Explain FIVE differences between capital expenditure and operational expenditure categories of spend for an organisation.
(25 marks)

正解：

解説：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
When discussingcapital expenditure (CapEx) and operational expenditure (OpEx)in the context of procurement and supply, it is essential to understand how they impact an organization's financial planning, decision-making, and procurement strategy. Below arefive key differencesbetween CapEx and OpEx:
1. Definition and Nature of Spend
* Capital Expenditure (CapEx):Refers to investments made by a company to acquire, upgrade, or maintain physical assets such as property, machinery, or equipment. These are typically large, one-time purchases that provide long-term benefits.
* Operational Expenditure (OpEx):Involves day-to-day expenses required to run the business, such as salaries, rent, utilities, and consumables.These costs are necessary for ongoing operations.
2. Accounting Treatment
* CapEx:Considered a long-term investment, it is capitalized and recorded as an asset on the balance sheet. Depreciation or amortization is applied over the useful life of the asset.
* OpEx:Fully expensed in the profit and loss statement in the accounting period in which it is incurred. It directly impacts the organization's profitability in the short term.
3. Budgeting and Approval Process
* CapEx:Requires substantial financial planning, detailed justification, and approval from senior management due to its high-cost implications.It often involves long-term financial commitment.
* OpEx:Generally included in the organization's operating budget and does not require extensive approval processes, as it consists of routine expenses necessary for daily business functions.
4. Impact on Cash Flow and Financial Planning
* CapEx:Affects cash flow significantly as it requires large upfront payments. Organizations often finance CapEx through loans, leasing, or long-term financial strategies.
* OpEx:Represents smaller, recurring costs that are easier to manage and predict within the financial year, allowing for more flexibility in cash flow management.
5. Examples of Procurement and Supply Considerations
* CapEx Examples:Purchasing manufacturing equipment, acquiring new office buildings, upgrading IT infrastructure (e.g., servers, data centers).
* OpEx Examples:Office supplies, utility bills, employee salaries, maintenance and repair costs, software subscriptions.
Conclusion
Understanding the distinction betweencapital expenditure and operational expenditureis essential for procurement and supply professionals to make informed financial decisions, align with corporate strategy, and ensure efficient resource allocation. Procurement teams must consider factors such as cost-benefit analysis, funding sources, and long-term value when determining the best approach for an organization's spending strategy.

質問 # 37
Describe the four main ways that a Public Sector organisation can procure goods or services (25 points)

正解：

解説：
See the solution inExplanation partbelow.
Explanation:
How to approach this question
- This question is testing to see if you know the 4 procurement procedures allowed in the Public Sector which are: open, restricted, competitive dialogue, competitive dialogue with negotiation. The Public Sector is limited in how it can procure due to the Public Contract Regulations, so things like Early Supplier Involvement isn't an option.
- The question doesn't specifically say it has to be these four, but these are the ones in the book. Because of the vagueness you could say something like running a competition and awarding via a Framework instead.
Talking about Public Private Partnerships could also be appropriate but that is outside of the scope of this module (and Level! It comes up in Level 5). These answers would be accepted.
- Also note that it doesn't say the UK in the question, so if you answered this about your own country, that would be fine.
Example Essay
Each country's government has its own regulations relating to how goods, services and works can be procured.
The UK's procurement rules is currently dictated by the Public Procurement Regulations 2015 which is based off EU Procurement Directives. This piece of legislation will likely be superseded in Autumn 2023 due to the UK leaving the EU. Until this point, the PCR allows UK public sector organisations to procure in the following ways: open, restricted, competitive dialogue, competitive dialogue with negotiation Open Procedure: This is the most straightforward and transparent method. A local government issues an open tender for office supplies. Any company that provides these supplies can submit a bid. The government then evaluates all bids based on price, quality, and delivery terms to select the supplier. Any interested supplier can submit a tender. The process is open from the outset, and all submissions are evaluated against pre-defined criteria. This procedure is used when you wish to attract a large number of bidders for the opportunity and is often posted online on a platform such as Find A Tender.com so that suppliers can find the opportunity. If it is a large contract it is a requirement for details to be published on OJEU. The disadvantage of using this approach is that you may receive many bids which can be time-consuming.
Restricted Procedure: In this method, the public sector organization invites suppliers to express their interest.
After a preliminary selection process, only those who meet the criteria are invited to submit tenders. This is used when the opportunity is more technical, for example a healthcare authority needs specialized medical equipment. The authority would requests expressions of interest from suppliers. After reviewing these, it invites a shortlist of qualified suppliers to submit detailed bids for further evaluation. The benefit of this approach is that unsuitable suppliers are weeded out early, this saving time.
Competitive Dialogue: This is used for complex contracts where the organization cannot define the technical means or legal or financial make-up of a project in advance. A dialogue with selected bidders is conducted to develop one or more suitable solutions, which are then put out to tender. For example, a local council is planning a new public transport system but is unsure of the best solution. It enters into a dialogue with several firms specializing in transport systems to explore various options before requesting final bids based on the developed solutions. Suppliers can be eliminated through the dialogue process based on pre-determined criteria.
Competitive Dialogue with Negotiation: Similar to competitive dialogue, but with an added phase of negotiation. It's used for particularly complex projects where the needs cannot be met without adaptation of readily available solutions. For example: a government department requires a complex IT system that integrates various existing systems. It engages in a competitive dialogue to develop potential solutions and then negotiates with bidders to refine these solutions before finalizing the contract. This procedure allows for negotiations with the winning bidder to readjust requirements if needed.
The approach taken by a public sector organisation will depend on a number of factors, but in particular the complexity of the project and whether there is a pre-determined scope. Other factors to consider include; the time-sensitiveness of the project and how quickly the procurement exercise needs to be completed, the amount of suppliers in the marketplace, and whether suppliers need to be consulted on to create the specification.
Tutor Notes
- These four procedures are outlined on p.212. Post PCR 2015, these procedures may change, or be renamed, depending on what the UK government decide to do. So if you're taking this exam in November 2024 or later, note that the study guide is now out of date and you should conduct a bit of your own research.
- You could also mention that the value of spend is a factor when public sector organisations are deciding on a procurement route. For really low value stuff, like they need a new sofa for the office, most organisation's requirements are to get three quotes and compare them. That isn't in the study guide, it's just real life (I've worked in this sector so know thisstuff). Each organisation will have it's own thresholds for what procurement route needs to be taken, so I wouldn't comment on that but generally if it's under £10k there's quite a bit of flexibility. Where you reach 'threshold' then things become very serious and there's much more scrutiny.
- Thresholds are not part of the syllabus so don't worry about learning this. But if you're interested have a read here: New public procurement thresholds from 1 January 2024 - BM Insights - Blake Morgan

質問 # 38
Jan is a Contracts Manager at ABC Ltd and has recently awarded a contract to XYZ Ltd. Describe how she can manage the contract and supplier, detailing ways of monitoring performance and adding value for ABC Ltd (25 marks)

正解：

解説：
See the solution inExplanation partbelow.
Explanation:
How to approach this question:
- There are 4 sections to this essay, so before you start writing I'd make a couple of notes on each of the points. Then build those notes into separate paragraphs. Your notes may look like this:
How to manage the contract - ensuring contract is fit for purpose, holding XYZ to their responsibilities, ensuring ABC are also fulfilling their responsibilities, issuing contract variations if required, planning for contingencies.
- How to manage the supplier - ensure the right relationship is in place (transactional vs collaborative), communication - open and honest, ensure there is mutual trust and understanding of each other's goals/ objectives.
- Ways of monitoring performance - use KPIs / SLAs, Supplier Scorecard, Vendor Rating, feedback from customers
- How to add value for ABC - increasing efficiencies (e.g. less product defects), improved quality, assisting with Value Engineering exercises, reduction in time and costs (e.g. through improved processes such as ordering), the supplier delivers 'extras' for ABC such as training to staff at no additional cost.
- Ensure each paragraph refers to Jan, ABC and XYZ. The question doesn't state what the businesses are buying/ selling so you can use this as an opportunity to provide examples: 'if ABC are procuring raw materials from XYZ such as metal, an effective way to manage performance would include .... If they are procuring a service, it may be more beneficial to use .... methodology' Example Essay Jan, the Contracts Manager at ABC Ltd, plays a pivotal role in ensuring the success of the recently awarded contract with XYZ Ltd. Efficient contract and supplier management involves careful planning, communication, performance monitoring, and the continuous addition of value. Here's how Jan can navigate these aspects:
In terms of contract management, Jan must ensure that the terms and conditions of the contract are "fit for purpose," aligning with the specific needs and complexity of the procurement. For instance, a simple goods procurement may necessitate a concise document, while more intricate projects like engineering endeavors may require a detailed contract such as a JCT or NEC contract. Additionally, Jan should vigilantly manage the contract during its lifespan, addressing any potential 'scope creep' that might necessitate amendments. If the contract lacks provisions for such changes, Jan may need to initiate the creation of a new contract to accommodate evolving needs Clear delineation of responsibilities and contingencies is crucial in the contract to ensure accountability and preparedness for unforeseen circumstances. The inclusion of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and damage clauses, where appropriate, adds a layer of clarity and accountability to the contractual relationship. Planning for contingencies involves having backup strategies in place, especially considering potential challenges that may arise during the collaboration with XYZ Ltd. For example, having other suppliers she can call upon if XYZ fail to deliver on an order.
Turning to supplier management, Jan's role involves fostering a positive and productive relationship with XYZ Ltd. This includes regular meetings to discuss progress, achievements, and future plans. A mobilization meeting is particularly important to ensure a strong start to the contract. Subsequent monthly or quarterly meetings provide a platform to review performance retrospectively and plan for the future. Additionally, effective communication is paramount, with Jan ensuring that both organizations regularly communicate, particularly regarding urgent issues that may require immediate attention. This proactive communication can occur through various channels, such as email or phone calls, facilitating a swift resolution of any emerging concerns.
Trust and honesty form the bedrock of the relationship between ABC Ltd and XYZ Ltd. Jan should work towards fostering mutual trust through both formal and informal activities, recognizing the importance of a transparent and cooperative partnership In terms of performance monitoring, Jan can employ Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to track performance regularly. These metrics should not be viewed as one-off activities but rather as ongoing tools for assessing and ensuring that performance aligns with expectations. Clear communication regarding the consequences of failing to meet these targets, such as the implementation of a Performance Improvement Plan or potential contract cancellation, is essential for maintaining accountability.
Regular performance meetings between ABC Ltd and XYZ Ltd provide an opportunity to discuss achievements, setbacks, and any necessary adjustments. Beyond quantitative metrics, surveys and feedback from customers can provide qualitative insights into performance.
Finally, Jan can contribute to the partnership's success by focusing on adding value. This involves going above and beyond the contractual obligations, such as delivering products more efficiently at no additional cost or improving operational efficiencies. Encouraging XYZ Ltd to participate in Value Engineering exercises and engaging in Early Supplier Involvement to shape and define future requirements would be a good example of this. Additionally, providing 'add-ons' or 'extras' outside the contractual framework, such as training for ABC Ltd staff, further enhances the value derived from the partnership.
In conclusion, Jan's role as Contracts Manager extends beyond the initial awarding of a contract- rather her role involves strategic contract and supplier management throughoutthe lifetime of the professional relationship. By ensuring the contract is well-suited for its purpose, fostering a positive relationship with the supplier, monitoring performance effectively, and consistently adding value, Jan contributes to the success of the collaboration between ABC Ltd and XYZ Ltd. This comprehensive approach sets the stage for a mutually beneficial and enduring partnership.
Tutor Notes:
- A case study question like this in the real exam is likely to come with more details. They often come with lots and lots of details to be honest, talking about what XYZ supplies to ABC and the names of the people involved. The case study usually gives you some good clues as to what the examiner will be looking for you to include, so do read them carefully.
- You don't have to include much 'theory' on case study questions - the important thing is to reference Jan as much as possible. BUT you could throw in a cheeky mention of the Kraljic matrix. The approach to managing the contract and supplier would depend on the type of item supplied by XYZ - e.g. if it is a bottleneck item the supplier may need to be handled differently to if it is a routine item. You could also mention KPIs and objectives as being 'SMART' - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-Bound
- study guide p.86-90 / p.94 / p.96 -98

質問 # 39
Explain what is meant by Corporate Governance and why having Corporate Governance structures is important. Discuss 2 obstacles which may impede an organisation achieving high levels of Corporate Governance. (25 points)

正解：

解説：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
- Firstly start with a definition of Corporate Governance - this means the rules, policies, processes and organisational structures that ensure an organisation adheres to accepted ethical standards, good practices, the law and regulations. It's the systems put in place which directs and controls organisations to do 'the right thing'.
- Then move on to discuss why having this is important - I'd maybe think of 3-4 examples here such as:
protects the interest of shareholders, reduces risk, moral obligations, legal obligations
- The last part of your essay should talk about the 2 obstacles - describe two from the following list: lack of executive support, poor stakeholder co-operation, lack of clarity and / or resources, having poor IT systems, lack of co-ordination of procurement responsibilities. Because you're only talking about 2 here, you'll need to go into detail about them. So pick 2 you know well. Don't be tempted to talk about more than 2. You won't get extra marks.
Example Essay:
Corporate governance refers to the system of rules, practices, processes, and structures by which a company is directed and controlled. It encompasses the relationships among a company's management, its board of directors, shareholders, and other stakeholders. The primary objective of corporate governance is to ensure that the company operates in an ethical, transparent, and accountable manner, safeguarding the interests of shareholders and promoting long-term value creation. Corporate governance can be defined internally (by shareholders/ managers) or externally (by governments and international standard-setting bodies such as ISO) and is important for all organisations Corporate governance is needed because you can't assume everyone will act ethically- rules and procedures need to be written down and the organisation needs to have recourse for dealing with behaviour that falls outside of what is accepted. Procurement's role in Corporate Governance includes control over finance and expenditure, ensuring the supply chain is 'clean' (i.e. not involved in unethical business practices such as child labour) and risk management.
Why having a corporate governance structure is important:
1) The procurement department has a 'stewardship' role - it controls large sums of organisation's funds.
There are many opportunities to commit fraud, make unethical or biased decisions so it's important that there are corporate governance structures in place to prevent this. It protects the organisation from individuals with bad intent, scandal, and legal repercussions.
2) Strong Corporate Governance is required to successfully manage a supply chain. It's important to ensure good relationships- suppliers need to see you as a 'good customer'. If your organisation is seen to be unethical or underhand, suppliers may not want to work with you.
3) Financial impact - where corporate governance isn't implemented, there may be financial costs for the organisation. For example, in the Public Sector if a supplier successfully challenges a tender award, the buyer may have to award the value of the tender - so there's financial impact on a company if corporate governance isn't followed.
Obstacle 1 - lack of senior management support
Unless there is buy-in from the senior leadership team it will not be possible for departments such as Procurement to implement sound Corporate Governance procedures. Corporate Governance needs to be directed from the top of an organisation to ensure all departments and staff give importance to this. If Senior Leadership are seen not to care about implementing or following Corporate Governance, other staff won't care either. They need to lead by example to ensure the whole organisation 'buys into' the processes.
Obstacle 2 - Poor IT infrastructure.
For Corporate Governance to be effective, an effective IT system must be implemented. For example, to avoid fraud it's not just necessary to have a written anti-fraud policy, there must be ways of checking that fraud isn't being committed. The way to do this is to have an effective IT system which can flag anomaly payments and procurement activities outside of what is considered 'normal'. Therefore, having a poor IT infrastructure is a barrier to effective Corporate Governance.
In conclusion, corporate governance is essential for building trust among stakeholders and contributing to the overall success and sustainability of a company. Effective governance structures and practices instil confidence in investors, enhance the company's reputation, and foster a culture of responsibility and accountability throughout the organization. Good corporate governance is a cornerstone of sound business management and contributes to the long-term prosperity of the company.
Tutor Notes
- Corporate Governance became a big thing in the 70s and 80s following high profile scandals and the collapse of several companies. Investors were concerned about what companies were doing which led to increased control on the powers of directors and greater transparency of corporate actions.
- Examples of Corporate Governance. Enron is a good real life example you could use: Impact of Bad Corporate Governance - Corporate Fraud and Corruption: A Holistic Approach to Preventing Financial Crises (ebrary.net)
- This is a really good real-life example of Public Sector procurement gone wrong: Flawed nuclear tender sees
£100m payout to firms - BBC News
- Adding in some real life examples will take your essay from a Merit result (50-70%) to a Distinction (70% +)
- Another way this topic can come up as a question is describing the elements of corporate governance, or asking what a procurement manager should do when corporate governance is broken/ not followed.
- LO 3.1 p.117

質問 # 40
......

あなたのIT領域での能力を証明したいのですか。もっと多くの認可と就職機会を貰いたいのですか。CIPSのL4M1試験はあなたの必要のある証明です。IT業界でのほとんどの人はCIPSのL4M1試験の重要性を知っています。だれでもエネルギーは限られていますから、短い時間でCIPSのL4M1試験に合格したいなら、我々JPTestKingの提供するソフトはあなたを助けることができます。豊富な問題と分析で作るソフトであなたはCIPSのL4M1試験に合格することができます。

L4M1難易度受験料: https://www.jptestking.com/L4M1-exam.html